Construction and Characterization of an Acapsular Mutant of <i>Mannheimia haemolytica</i> A1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nmaA and nmaB genes, which code for UDP-GlcNAc-2-epimerase and UDP-ManNAc-dehydrogenase, respectively, are involved in capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis in Mannheimia haemolytica A1. A chloramphenicol resistance (Cm(r)) cassette cloned behind an M. haemolytica A1 promoter, plpcat, was created and used to interrupt nmaA and nmaB. A 1.3-kbp DNA fragment that encompasses part of nmaA and nmaB was replaced by the 1.0-kbp plpcat, resulting in a knockout mutant which is Cm(r) and unable to synthesize N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) and N-acetylmannosaminuronic acid (ManNAcA). The DNA replacement was confirmed by Southern hybridization and PCR analyses of the nmaA and nmaB loci. Electron microscopy examination of the mutant showed the absence of capsular materials compared to the parent strain. The loss of NmaA and NmaB activity was confirmed by analysis of carbohydrate moieties using capillary electrophoresis. Serum sensitivity assays indicated that the acapsular mutant is as resistant as the encapsulated parent to complement-mediated killing by colostrum-deprived calf serum but is more sensitive to killing by immune bovine serum. Analysis of lipopolysaccharide prepared from the acapsular mutant and encapsulated parent confirmed that these strains have long O-polysaccharide chains, possibly conferring resistance to serum-mediated killing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".