La trahison créatrice : anatomie du transfert notionnel dans les cultures asiatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La trahison créatrice : anatomie du transfert notionnel dans les cultures asiatiques — Nous proposons une lecture constructiviste du phénomène de transfert conceptuel dans les traditions philosophiques et religieuses de la Chine et du Japon. Par transfert, nous entendons aussi bien l'emprunt d'une notion isolée et son insertion dans un nouveau système culturel que la translation d'un ensemble catégoriel complexe. Nous nous intéressons surtout aux distorsions sémantiques qui se produisent lors du transfert (et à ces cas extrêmes que sont les transformations délibérées) pour illustrer l'hypothèse suivante : l'importation d'un concept est toujours un acte de création. Nous soulignons l'importance des structures intentionnelles qui marquent le geste de translation : prospection, pré-interprétation, stratégies d'utilisation, etc. Cette hypothèse nous permet d'étudier la traduction philosophique en faisant l'économie de la problématique de la vérité, et ensuite de contester l'étiquette de « cultures de la copie » trop souvent apposée aux traditions d'Extrême-Asie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".