Growth performance and nutrient utilization of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with phytase alone or in combination with citric acid and multicarbohydrase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of supplementing a corn-soybean meal-based diet with phytase alone or in combination with citric acid (CA) or multicarbohydrase, a preparation containing nonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes, or both, on growth performance, nutrient utilization, and bone mineralization. A total of 360 one-day-old broiler chicks were assigned to 6 dietary treatments, consisting of 12 pens of 5 birds each, and were fed experimental diets from 1 to 21 d of age. The diets included a positive control (0.46% nonphytate P; 1.1% Ca) and a negative control (NC; 0.26% nonphytate P; 0.89% Ca) without or with phytase (600 U/kg) alone, phytase plus CA (5 g/kg), phytase plus multicarbohydrase (Superzyme OM; 0.6 g/kg), or phytase (Ronozyme P-CT) plus CA and multicarbohydrase. Birds fed the positive control diet had higher (P<0.05) BW gain (764 vs. 594 g/21 d) and tibia ash content (50.0 vs. 38.3%) than those fed the NC diet. Phytase improved (P<0.05) BW gain (632 g/21 d), which increased further (P<0.05) to 673 g/21 d for the phytase plus multicarbohydrase diet. In contrast to phytase alone, phytase plus multicarbohydrase supplementation improved (P<0.05) feed conversion ratio of the NC diet from 1.37 to 1.32. Tibia ash content for the NC diet increased (P<0.05) from 38.3 to 42.4% due to phytase addition. Phytase improved (P<0.05) ileal digestibility of P from 29.5 to 43%, and the addition of CA or multicarbohydrase, or both, to a phytase-supplemented diet further increased (P<0.05) P digestibility to 51.5, 53.4, and 54.3%, respectively. Phytase addition improved (P<0.05) diet AMEn content from 2,959 to 3,068 kcal/kg, which tended (P<0.06) to increase further with CA (3,150 kcal/kg) or multicarbohydrase (3,142 kcal/kg) addition. No beneficial interactions were detected between CA and multicarbohydrase for all response criteria measured. Results show that addition of multicarbohydrase to the phytase-supplemented broiler diets improved nutrient utilization and growth performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".