MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150685171 · doi:10.4141/s99-047

Phosphorus release from coated monoammonium phosphate: Effect of coating thickness, temperature, elution medium, soil moisture and placement method

2000· article· en· W2150685171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPolymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAgriculture Food and Rural Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryWater contentMoistureCoatingFertilizerPhosphorusPhosphateDiffusionSoil waterPolymerKineticsSoil scienceEnvironmental scienceThermodynamicsGeotechnical engineeringBiochemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coating fertilizer granules with a polymer slows the release of nutrients over a long period of time, so that the fertilizer uptake by plants may be enhanced. Two laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the effects of coating thickness, temperature, soil moisture, and placement method on the release rate of P from coated monoammonium phosphate (MAP) in soil; to compare the release rate of P from coated MAP in soil and in water; and to evaluate different kinetic equations for simulating the release of P from coated MAP. In exp. 1, release of P from 10 pre-weighed granules of a non-coated MAP and three polymer-coated MAP fertilizers (Coated I, 4%; Coated II, 4.5%; and Coated III, 5%) was determined in water at 10 and 23°C. In exp. 2, release of P from the four MAP fertilizers in soil was determined at two temperatures (10 and 23°C), two moisture levels (90 and 60% field capacity) and two placement methods (incorporation and banding). Four kinetic equations, i.e., simple Elovich, Parabolic diffusion, Power function, and First order kinetics, were evaluated to simulate the release of P from coated MAP. Activation energy of P release was calculated using the P release versus ln time plots of the simple Elovich equation. The release rate of P from coated MAP was strongly affected by coating thickness and temperature but was not affected by method of P placement and soil water content. The release of P from coated MAP was slower in soil than in water, and it decreased markedly with increasing thickness of polymer coating on MAP, whereas it increased with increasing temperature. The simple Elovich equation best described the release of P from coated MAP in both water and soil. The activation energy was not affected by elution medium and coating thickness but it was lower at the higher temperature. In conclusion, the test of P release rate from coated MAP in water may not represent the true release rate of P from coated MAP in soil, as it is influenced by elution medium, temperature and coating thickness. The simple Elovich equation best described the P release kinetics from coated MAP in soil and in water. Key words: Coating thickness, monoammonium phosphate, P release rate in water and soil, P release kinetics, placement method, soil moisture content, temperature

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it