Pulmonary surfactant and inflammation in septic adult mice: role of surfactant protein A
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surfactant alterations, alveolar cytokine changes, and the role of surfactant protein (SP)-A in septic mice were investigated. Sepsis was induced via cecal ligation and perforation (CLP). Septic and sham mice were euthanized at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 h after surgery. Mice deficient in SP-A and mice that overexpressed SP-A were euthanized 18 h after surgery. In wild-type, sham-operated mice, surfactant pool sizes were similar at all time points, whereas in the CLP groups there was a significant decrease in small-aggregate surfactant pool sizes beginning 6 h after CLP. Interleukin-6 concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from septic animals increased from 6 to 18 h after surgery. Identical surfactant alterations and concentrations of cytokines were observed in septic mice that were SP-A deficient or that overexpressed SP-A. In conclusion, alterations of pulmonary surfactant and alveolar cytokines occur simultaneously, 6 h after a systemic insult. In addition, we did not detect a role for SP-A in regulating surfactant phospholipid pool sizes or pulmonary inflammation in septic mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".