Dual-edge triggered pulsed energy recovery flip-flops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resonant clocking is an emerging effective method for reducing power consumption in the clock distribution network. In this technique a resonant (sinusoidal) clock replaces the traditional square wave clock signal. In this paper we combine the emerging resonant clocking technique with the well known dual-edge triggering scheme to enable further power reduction in the clock tree. We propose dual-edge triggering in three pulsed flip-flops that operate with a sinusoidal clock signal; namely: the Static Differential Energy Recovery (SDER) flip-flop, the Differential Conditional Capturing Energy Recovery (DCCER) flip-flop, and the Single-ended Conditional Capturing Energy Recovery (SCCER) flip-flop. The proposed dual-edge flip-flops were tested using STMicroelectronics 90nm process technology. Simulation results show the correct operation of the dual-edge triggered flip-flop at a frequency of 250MHz with throughput of 500 MHz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".