MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150890250 · doi:10.1643/cg-11-176

Ontogeny of Larval and Juvenile Black Redhorse (<i>Moxostoma duquesnei</i>)

2013· article· en· W2150890250 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Christopher M. Bunt, Thom Heiman, Nicholas E. Mandrak

Bibliographic record

VenueCopeia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsBiologyJuvenileZoologyMeristicsFisheryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adult Black Redhorse (Moxostoma duquesnei) were seined from the Grand River, Ontario and artificially spawned in May 2007 and May 2008. Eggs hatched after 9–16 days at a mean temperature of 20°C, and after 11–25 days at a mean temperature of 17°C. Eggs did not develop fully at temperatures <11°C. Eggs and development of larvae between 9 and 24 mm TL, and juveniles up to 35 mm TL are described. Ontogeny of larval and juvenile Black Redhorse was compared to that of Greater Redhorse (Moxostoma valenciennesi), River Redhorse (Moxostoma carinatum), Golden Redhorse (Moxostoma erythrurum), Shorthead Redhorse (Moxostoma macrolepidotum), Copper Redhorse (Moxostoma hubbsi), and Spotted Sucker (Minytrema melanops). There was significant overlap between most meristic variables compared. However, the majority of Black Redhorse in this study (up to 18 mm TL) generally had higher myomere counts that were different from most other redhorse species. These data, in combination with knowledge of variation in congeneric distributions and differences in spawning windows, may allow identification of Black Redhorse as small as 9 mm TL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCopeiaSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207