The Platform Protein Is Essential for Type IV Pilus Biogenesis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A systematic genetic analysis was performed to identify the inner membrane proteins essential for type IV pilus (T4P) expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. By inactivating the retraction aspect of pilus function, genes essential for T4P assembly were discriminated. In contrast to previous studies in the T4P system of Neisseria spp., we found that components of the inner membrane subcomplex consisting of PilMNOP were not essential for surface pilus expression, whereas the highly conserved inner membrane protein PilC was essential. Here, we present data that PilC may coordinate the activity of cytoplasmic polymerization (PilB) and depolymerization (PilT) ATPases via their interactions with its two cytoplasmic domains. Using in vitro co-affinity purification, we show that PilB interacts with the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of PilC. We hypothesized that PilT similarly interacts with the PilC C-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Overexpression of that domain in the wild-type protein reduced twitching motility by ∼50% compared with the vector control. Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved T4P-specific residues in the PilC C-terminal domain yielded mutant proteins that supported wild-type pilus assembly but had a reduced capacity to support twitching motility, suggesting impairment of putative PilC-PilT interactions. Taken together, our results show that PilC is an essential inner membrane component of the T4P system, controlling both pilus assembly and disassembly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it