Developmental Expression of Spermatid-Specific Thioredoxin-1 Protein: Transient Association to the Longitudinal Columns of the Fibrous Sheath During Sperm Tail Formation1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mammalian sperm tail presents a complex organization in which a number of additional structures, namely outer dense fibers and fibrous sheath, surround the central axoneme and are thought to regulate flagellar motility. We have previously described a novel member of the thioredoxin family of proteins with a spermatid specific expression pattern, spermatid-specific thioredoxin-1 (Sptrx-1). We report here the developmental analysis of Sptrx-1 expression during murine spermiogenesis. Immunocytochemical analysis of Sptrx-1 through the different steps of spermiogenesis in rat seminiferous tubule sections showed that its expression begins at step 9, gets progressively stronger until steps 14-16 (where a peak is reached), and then diminishes in steps 17 and 18 until practically no immunolabeling is detected in step 19 spermatid. During its transient expression in spermiogenesis, Sptrx-1 is most concentrated in the periaxonemal compartment of the tail of the elongating spermatid, except in the very last steps (steps 17-19), when periaxonemal labeling disappears and a residual buildup of Sptrx-1 occurs in the shrinking cytoplasmic lobe. Electron microscopic analysis by immunogold labeling pinpointed the localization of Sptrx-1 to the assembling longitudinal columns of the fibrous sheath, whereas the forming ribs of the fibrous sheath were unlabeled. Immunoblotting of isolated fibrous sheath and tails obtained from epididymal or ejaculated sperm of rat and human confirmed our immunocytochemical observation: Sptrx-1 is no longer a component of the mature fibrous sheath. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a protein that specifically associates to the fibrous sheath during development but does not become a permanent structural component. The expression pattern of Sptrx-1 during rat spermiogenesis suggests that it could be part of a nucleation center for the formation of the longitudinal columns and transverse ribs that bridge the latter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".