MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150982740 · doi:10.1080/09553000802389645

Age-dependent changes in oxygen tension, radiation dose and sensitivity within normal and diseased coronary arteries–Part B: Modeling oxygen diffusion into vessel walls

2008· article· en· W2150982740 on OpenAlexaff
Richard B. Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Radiation Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxygenCoronary arteriesCoronary artery diseaseArteryOxygen tensionSolubilityDiffusionChemistryCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The aim is to assess the change with age and disease of the oxygen concentration within the coronary artery walls.Materials and methods: In an accompanying paper, Part A, the age-dependent morphology and composition for the wall layers of normal and diseased coronary arteries were developed from published data. In this paper, Part B, the oxygen concentration in the coronary artery walls was evaluated taking account the diffusion of oxygen from blood and the solubility of oxygen in tissues. Part C evaluates the oxygen effect and its biological implications for different radiations.Results: Diseased arteries exhibited a relatively moderate increase in the solubility of oxygen (≤59%) in arteries with 88% luminal narrowing, as the high solubility in fat was partially offset by the lower solubility in calcium deposits. The oxygen partial pressure across the arterial wall was modeled and the avascular regions of arteries with ≥38% stenosis had anoxic areas.Conclusion: Based on simulation results from the one-dimensional diffusion model, extensive hypoxic areas were determined for atherosclerotic arteries in this analysis of oxygen levels in coronary arteries modelling for the first time the effects of age and disease and associated changes in oxygen solubility due to the presence of lipids and calcium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Radiation BiologySame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207