Cross-sectional evaluation of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation and C-reactive protein in healthy individuals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: The present study was designed to (a) examine the interrelationship between endothelial function and CRP in healthy individuals and (b) evaluate the relationship of each biomarker towards global Framingham risk scores. METHODS AND RESULTS: Brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD), CRP, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors were measured in the Firefighters and Their Endothelium (FATE) study, which recruited 1154 male participants (mean age 47.4+/-9.8 years) with no known history of cardiovascular disease. No relationship was observed between FMD and CRP (p = 0.96). FMD and the Framingham risk score tended to correlate but not significantly (p = 0.07). A lower FMD was related to a higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) in the univariate analysis, and higher systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001) in the multivariate analysis. Elevated CRP levels independently correlated most closely with overall Framingham risk score (r = 0.36, p < 0.001) and a weaker although statistically significant relationship was seen with individual traditional cardiovascular risk factors (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided evidence that brachial artery FMD had no relationship to CRP in a large cohort of healthy subjects. These observations suggest that the predictive value of CRP may be largely independent of abnormalities in endothelial function. The additive prognostic value of endothelial vasodilator testing remains to be established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".