Infrared Studies of the Potential Controlled Adsorption of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate at the Au(111) Electrode Surface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantitative subtractively normalized interfacial Fourier transform infrared reflection spectroscopy (SNIFTIRS) was used to determine the conformation and orientation of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) molecules adsorbed at the single crystal Au(111) surface. The SDS molecules form a hemimicellar/hemicylindrical (phase I) structure for the range of potentials between -200 ≤ E < 450 mV and condensed (phase II) film for electrode potentials ≥500 mV vs Ag/AgCl. The SNIFTIRS measurements indicate that the alkyl chains within the two adsorbed states of SDS film are in the liquid-crystalline state rather than the gel state. However, the sulfate headgroup is in an oriented state in phase I and is disordered in phase II. The newly acquired SNIFTIR spectroscopy measurements were coupled with previous electrochemical, atomic force microscopy, and neutron reflectivity data to improve the current existing models of the SDS film adsorbed on the Au(111) surface. The IR data support the existence of a hemicylindrical film for SDS molecules adsorbed at the Au(111) surface in phase I and suggest that the structure of the condensed film in phase II can be more accurately modeled by a disordered bilayer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".