Resident corticolous oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida): Decay in community similarity with vertical distance from the ground
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decrease in community similarity was examined in corticolous oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) sampled along a 36-m vertical profile of 5 western redcedar trees in a temperate rainforest on Vancouver Island, Canada. Samples were collected every 2 m, and all adult oribatid mites were identified to species. When compared to species recorded from previous ground/canopy sampling efforts in the same trees, the 62 corticolous species unequivocally support the separation of these 2 communities at 4m. All sampling heights contained canopy oribatid species, but only 0–4 m communities contained ground-dwelling oribatids. There was significant overall spatial autocorrelation and decay in community similarity with distance originating from species turnover at 4 m, suggesting limited range expansion of ground species into corticolous habitats. Community similarity, richness, and abundance of corticolous oribatid mite assemblages were not autocorrelated after 4 m above ground. Observed patterns at 4 m likely represent an environmental transition zone for ground-dwelling species, such as changes in moisture availability, rather than a physical dispersal barrier for individuals. We conclude that the trunk is not a dispersal corridor for ground species to colonize tree crowns and suggest that low similarity between nearest neighbouring sampling points, combined with the presence of immature and gravid oribatids, supports the assumption that corticolous oribatid mite assemblages are likely dispersal-limited residents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".