Impact of Dnmt1 deficiency, with and without low folate diets, on tumor numbers and DNA methylation in Min mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although a number of studies have suggested that diets with low intake of folate, an important methyl donor, are associated with increased risks of colon cancer and its precursor the adenomatous polyp, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Dysregulation and instability of DNA methylation and alterations in the levels of the predominant DNA methylating enzyme, DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1), have also been linked to tumorigenesis. We have used a combination of genetic and dietary manipulation to assess the effects of reduced Dnmt1 expression with and without folate deficiency on tumor induction in the Apc(Min) mouse. Apc(Min) mice with a reduction in Dnmt1 expression (Apc(Min/+)/Dnmt1(C/+)) had significantly lower tumor numbers than Apc(Min) mice with normal Dnmt1 (Apc(Min/+)/Dnmt1(+/+)). Dietary folate deficiency from weaning to 13 weeks of age did not affect tumor number or size in Apc(Min/+)/Dnmt(+/+) mice. However, in Apc(Min/+)/Dnmt1(C/+) mice with high baseline tumor numbers (41 +/- 4), folate deficiency was associated with a decreased absolute number of tumors (27 +/- 3), but a higher proportion of larger tumors as compared with mice on the control diet. In the repeat experiment, Apc(Min/+)/Dnmt1(C/+) mice had low baseline tumor numbers (20 +/- 2) and folate deficiency did not affect tumor number (23 +/- 4) or size as compared with the same mice on the control diet. These results suggest that, in the presence of Dnmt1 deficiency, the effects of folate deficiency on tumor number and size may depend on the stage of adenoma development when folate deficiency is initiated. We also show that folate deficiency with or without reductions in Dnmt1 did not affect overall genomic DNA methylation or the methylation levels of two candidate genes, E-cadherin or p53, in normal or neoplastic intestinal tissue. In conclusion, genetic deficiency in Dnmt1 with or without folate deficiency decreases tumor number in the Apc(Min) mouse model, but this effect may not be mediated by changes in SAM or SAH levels, nor by alterations in global methylation in the pre-neoplastic intestinal tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".