MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2151208244 · doi:10.1029/2003jc002042

Optical properties of melting landfast sea ice and underlying seawater in Santala Bay, Gulf of Finland

2004· article· en· W2151208244 on OpenAlexaff
Jens K. Ehn, Mats A. Granskog, Anu Reinart, A. Erm

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceMelt pondSeawaterOceanographyArctic ice packGeologyMeltwaterBayDownwellingSnowUpwellingSea ice thicknessGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In March and early April 2000, spectral irradiance measurements were conducted on 10 occasions above and beneath the landfast sea ice in Santala Bay near the entrance to the Gulf of Finland. The measurements included the spectral albedo and transmittance of the sea ice and the downwelling and upwelling spectral irradiance at different depths in the water column. Spectral albedos integrated over 400–700 nm photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) were in the range of 0.16–0.58, with most common values between 0.33 and 0.42. Maximum transmittances for the ice are found close to 570 nm, decreasing toward shorter and longer wavelengths. Correspondingly, diffuse attenuation coefficients for both seawater and sea ice agree well with earlier measurements in the Baltic Sea and have a PAR attenuation of 0.4–0.7 and 3.1–4.7 m−1, respectively. During the measurement period the ice reached its maximum thickness of 28 cm and thereafter started to decay. The sea ice was snow free; however, the formation of high‐scattering melt/freeze layers above the freeboard largely increased the surface reflectance. Discharged meltwater was retained beneath the sea ice, forming a low‐salinity layer which only disappeared as the ice ablated in April. Compared with many parts of the Arctic, the sea ice and seawater in Santala Bay contain higher amounts of dissolved and particulate matter, which are indicated by high absorption at wavelengths below 700 nm and thus potentially increase the melt rate of the sea ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→