Heterologous Production of <i>Clostridium cellulovorans engB</i> , Using Protease-Deficient <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> , and Preparation of Active Recombinant Cellulosomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cellulosomes produced by Clostridium spp., the high-affinity interaction between the dockerin domain and the cohesin domain is responsible for the assembly of enzymatic subunits into the complex. Thus, heterologous expression of full-length enzymatic subunits containing the dockerin domains and of the scaffolding unit is essential for the in vitro assembly of a "designer" cellulosome, or a recombinant cellulosome with a specific function. We report the preparation of Clostridium cellulovorans recombinant cellulosomes containing the enzymatic subunit EngB and the scaffolding unit, mini-CbpA, containing a cellulose binding domain, a putative cell wall binding domain, and two cohesin units. The full-length EngB containing the dockerin domain was expressed by Bacillus subtilis WB800, which is deficient in eight extracellular proteases, to prevent the proteolytic cleavage of the enzymatic subunit between the catalytic and dockerin domains that was observed in previous attempts to express EngB with Escherichia coli. The assembly of recombinant EngB with the mini-CbpA was confirmed by immunostaining, a cellulose binding experiment, and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".