Protease‐activated receptor‐4 (PAR<sub>4</sub>): a role as inhibitor of visceral pain and hypersensitivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protease-activated receptor-4 (PAR(4)) belongs to the family of receptors activated by the proteolytic cleavage of their extracellular N-terminal domain and the subsequent binding of the newly released N-terminus. While largely expressed in the colon, the role of PAR(4) in gut functions has not been defined. We have investigated the effects of PAR(4) agonist on colonic sensations and sensory neuron signalling, and its role in visceral pain. We observed that a single administration of the PAR(4) agonist peptide (AYPGKF-NH(2)), but not the control peptide (YAPGKF-NH(2)) into the colon lumen of mice significantly reduced the visceromotor response to colorectal distension at different pressures of distension. Further, intracolonic administration of the PAR(4) agonist, but not the control peptide, was able to significantly inhibit PAR(2) agonist- and transcient receptor potential vanilloid-4 (TRPV4) agonist-induced allodynia and hyperalgesia in response to colorectal distension. Protease-activated receptor-4 was detected in sensory neurons projecting from the colon, and isolated from the dorsal root ganglia, where it co-expressed with PAR(2) and TRPV4. In total sensory neurons, PAR(4) agonist exposure inhibited free intracellular calcium mobilization induced by the pro-nociceptive agonists of PAR(2) and TRPV4. Finally, PAR(4)-deficient mice experienced increased pain behaviour in response to intracolonic administration of mustard oil, compared with wild-type littermates. These results show that PAR(4) agonists modulate colonic nociceptive response, inhibit colonic hypersensitivity and primary afferent responses to pro-nociceptive mediators. Endogenous activation of PAR(4) also plays a major role in controlling visceral pain. These results identify PAR(4) as a previously unknown modulator of visceral nociception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".