THE ECONOMY OF CONTEMPORARY, CANADIAN POETRY: GENDER IN PERSPECTIVE?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo assinala a principal tendência seguida na poesia contemporânea canadense escrita por mulheres, a partir da obra Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature, de Margaret Atwood, e aponta considerações a serem revisitadas nos estudos da poesia, particularmente nos relativos àquela produzida na transculturalidade canadense de um mundo globalizado, dos anos 1970 em diante.Résumé: Cet article signale la principale tendance suivie par la poésie canadienne contemporaine, écrite par des femmes, à partir de l’œuvre de Margaret Atwood Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature et suggère quelques considérations à revisiter dans les études de poésie, particulièrement dans celles qui ont trait à la poésie produite dans l’atmosphère transculturelle du monde globalisé à partir de 1970.Mots-clés: poésie canadienne; voix féminines; monde globalisé.Abstract: This article points out to the main tendency followed in contemporary, Canadian poetry written by women, from the publication of Margaret Atwood’s work Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature and brings up some considerations to be revisited in the studies of poetry, particularly related to that produced in the Canadian transcultural atmosphere of the global world from the 1970’s on.Keywords: contemporary Canadian poetry; women’s poetry; transcultural poetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.053 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.024 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".