Coupled Experimental and Thermodynamic Optimization of the Na <sub>2</sub> O–FeO–Fe <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> –Al <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> System: Part 2. Thermodynamic Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A complete thermodynamic description of the Na 2 O–FeO–Fe 2 O 3 –Al 2 O 3 system was conducted based on the critical evaluation and optimization of available thermodynamic properties and phase diagram data. The thermodynamic behavior of the liquid solution was described using the Modified Quasichemical Model, and the solid solutions Na(Al,Fe)O 2 meta‐oxides and Na 2 (Al,Fe) 12 O 19 Na‐β″‐alumina were modeled using the Compound Energy Formalism considering their sublattice structures. Most experimental phase diagram data at reducing and oxidizing conditions were reproduced within 3 mol% of compositional error ranges. Many unexplored phase diagrams of this system under different oxygen partial pressures were predicted within the estimated accuracy of ±5 mol% in composition and ±50 K in temperature from the present thermodynamic models with optimized parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".