MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151351305

Significant association of DNA repair gene Ku80 genotypes with breast cancer susceptibility in Taiwan.

2009· article· en· W2151351305 on OpenAlexaff
Hwei Chung Wang, Chiu Shong Liu, Chang Fang Chiu, Su Yin Chiang, Chung Hsing Wang, Rou Fen Wang, Cheng‐Chieh Lin, Ru Yin Tsai, Da Tian Bau

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsTerry Fox Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerKu80GenotypeOncologyAlleleMedicinePopulationInternal medicineCancerCase-control studyBiologyGeneticsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To evaluate the association between the genotypes of the heterodimeric DNA-binding component, Ku80 gene and the breast cancer risk in Taiwan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this hospital-based case-control study, the association of Ku80 G-1401T rs828907, Ku80 C-319T rs11685387 and Ku80 intron19 rs9288518 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk in a Taiwanese population was investigated. In total, 1272 patients with breast cancer and the same number of age- and gender-matched healthy controls were genotyped. RESULTS: A significantly different distribution was found in the frequency of the Ku80 G-1401T genotype, but not the Ku80 C-319T or intron 19 genotypes, between the breast cancer and control groups. The T allele Ku80 G-1401T conferred a significant (p=0.0069) increased risk of breast cancer. Gene interactions with smoking, but not with breastfeeding, were significant for the Ku80 G-1401T polymorphism. The Ku80 G-1401T GT and TT genotypes in association with smoking conferred an increased risk of 3.162 (95% confidence interval=2.275-4.393) for breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The T allele of Ku80 G-1401T may be associated with the development of breast cancer and may be a novel useful marker for breast cancer detection and prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207