MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151430266 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0018

Upper limit on room-temperature diffusion of metal impurities interstitially dissolved in amorphous Si

2013· article· en· W2151430266 on OpenAlexaffvenue
O. Diop, S. Roorda

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal diffusivityImpurityAmorphous solidHydrogenDopingDiffusionMaterials scienceMetalAmorphous metalAmorphous carbonIonSiliconActivation energyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsChemical physicsPhysicsCrystallographyPhysical chemistryMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impurity profiles of Cu and Ag in amorphous silicon were studied before and after one year storage at room temperature and found to be indistinguishable. Since just before storage, hydrogen had been ion implanted into the uniformly metal doped layer, a diffusivity in excess of 3 × 10 −24 m 2 /s would have led to an observable change in the impurity profile. Therefore the room-temperature diffusivity must be less than that (3 × 10 −24 m 2 /s), which in turn implies one of two possibilities: either the interstitial diffusivity is much lower than previously determined, or the metal impurities were not fully detrapped by the implanted hydrogen. A subsequent thermal anneal at 450 °C confirmed that the detrapping and diffusion of Ag and Cu in H-implanted amorphous Si conforms to its normal behaviour. The low value of the room-temperature diffusivity is important for the interpretation of forthcoming measurements on high-energy ion tracks in amorphous Si.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207