Impact behavior and finite element prediction of the compression after impact strength of foam/vinylester-glass composite sandwiches
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the impact and compression after impact behavior of PVC foam cored /E-glass reinforced/vinylester sandwiches used in a four-seat amphibian aircraft. The impact damage was sorted in three categories: barely visible impact damage; visible impact damage; and clearly visible impact damage. It was observed that when increasing impact energy, the extension of the damage from barely visible impact damage to visible impact damage corresponds to a significantly high rate of energy absorption as depicted by the absorbed energy/impact energy ratio. Sandwich coupons were modeled with the finite element analysis ANSYS software to predict the critical failure load in presence of damage zones equivalent to those observed experimentally. The finite element model predicts consistently the compression after impact strength of undamaged coupons and this result confirms the model used to represent the woven fabric by an equivalent cross-ply laminate model. However, the finite element overestimates the compression after impact strength of impacted ones. It is suggested that the induced out-of-plane displacements generate stress concentrations in the tip of cracks located at the borders of the damaged zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it