Est-il recommandé de faire une dose test au moment de l’administration intramusculaire du fer dextran?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume Lorsqu’un medicament couramment utilise en pratique est retire du marche, nous devons analyser notre arsenal therapeutique afin de trouver une solution de rechange a ce produit. Comme ce fut le cas l’automne dernier, le fabricant du fer sorbitol (Jectofer ᴹᴰ), medicament que l’on administrait seulement par la voie intramusculaire, en a cesse la production. La solution de rechange a ce produit est le fer dextran. Plusieurs questions sont alors soulevees concernant sa securite en cas d’administration intramusculaire. Le present article est inspire de quelques questions recues au centre d’information pharmacotherapeutique du CHUM au cours de l’automne 2002. Abstract When a medication used in clinical practice is taken off the market, an alternative product needs to be used. Last fall, sorbitol iron (Jectoferᵗᵐ), was discontinued. An alternative to this product is dextran iron. Several questions were raised concerning the security of administration of intramuscular dextran iron. This article presents some of the questions received at the CHUM drug information center concerning the use of dextran iron.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".