MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151678893 · doi:10.1002/nme.1871

Umbrella spherical integration: a stable meshless method for non‐linear solids

2006· article· en· W2151678893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeshfree methodsMoving least squaresRegularized meshless methodMathematicsBendingBoundary value problemGridConvergence (economics)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisSingular boundary methodFinite element methodGeometryStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A stable meshless method for studying the finite deformation of non‐linear three‐dimensional (3D) solids is presented. The method is based on a variational framework with the necessary integrals evaluated through nodal integration. The method is truly meshless, requiring no 3D meshing or tessellation of any form. A local least‐squares approximation about each node is used to obtain necessary deformation gradients. The use of a local field approximation makes automatic grid refinement and the application of boundary conditions straightforward. Stabilization is achieved through the use of special ‘umbrella’ shape functions that have discontinuous derivatives at the nodes. Novel efficient algorithms for constructing the nodal stars and computing the nodal volumes are presented. The method is applied to four test problems: uniaxial tension, simple shear and bending of a bar, and cylindrical indentation. Convergence studies at infinitesimal strain show that the method is well‐behaved and converges with the number of nodes for both uniform and non‐uniform grids. Typical of meshless methods employing nodal integration, the total energy can be underestimated due to the approximate integration. At finite deformation the method reproduces known exact solutions. The bending example demonstrates an interesting example of torsional buckling resulting from the bending. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it