Alterations in Gene Expression in the Caput Epididymides of Nonobstructive Azoospermic Men1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spermatozoal maturation in the epididymis is dependent on proteins secreted by the epithelium and those that create the proper ionic composition and pH of the lumen as well as the blood-epididymal barrier. For the human epididymis, little information exists about the regulation of these proteins in male infertility. Our objectives were to assess gene expression profiles in the caput epididymidis from men with normal spermatogenesis and men with nonobstructive azoospermia. With microarrays, we identified 414 genes in the caput epididymidis that were differentially regulated in infertile men by at least 2-fold compared with the fertile men. They were mostly involved in transcription, intracellular signaling, immunity, and fertility. Although the expression of genes encoding tight junctional proteins was not affected, the localization of CLDN10 and TJP1, but not CLDNs 1, 3, and 8, was altered in infertile patients, suggesting that there are changes in the paracellular functions of the blood-epididymal barrier. Differentially regulated genes included several encoding proteins involved in spermatozoal maturation, water and ion channels, and beta-defensins: CRISP1, SPINLW1, FAM12B, and DEFB129 were upregulated, whereas CFTR, AQP5, KCNK4, KCNK17, SLC6A20, SLC13A3, DEFB126, and DEFB106A were downregulated. Furthermore, the immunolocalization of AQP5, but not of CFTR or CRISP1, varied in infertile and fertile patients. The observation that the expression of genes involved in water and ion transport were repressed in infertile patients suggests that these genes are regulated by the presence of testicular products or spermatozoa in the epididymal lumen or are part of a broader syndrome associated with nonobstructive azoospermia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".