Myelinated retinal fibers in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myelinated retinal nerve fibers are considered a hallmark of autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) in French Canadian patients. The demonstration of a worldwide distribution of this disease, as well as the almost invariable presence of a normal retina on fundoscopy in cases outside Canada, suggests that more quantitative methodologies are needed to assess the retina in ARSACS. METHODS: To characterize better the retinal features of ARSACS, we studied five Italian patients by means of optical coherence tomography (OCT), a processing method that allows the creation of three-dimensional images with micrometer resolution. We compared OCT characteristics in ARSACS with those obtained from five subjects with persistent myelination of the retina, a rare congenital non-progressive anomaly. RESULTS: Four patients with ARSACS showed myelinated retinal nerve fibers on ophthalmoscopy, corresponding to an increased thickness of the retina on OCT, a characteristic not present in the subjects with persistent myelination of the retina. CONCLUSIONS: Myelinated retinal fibers are not rare in Italian patients with ARSACS. This finding may be the consequence of the thickening of the retina, as detected by OCT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".