MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151851437 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2008.5074588

Probabilistically-constrained approaches to the design of the multiple antenna downlink

2008· article· en· W2151851437 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Botros Shenouda, Timothy N. Davidson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel state informationMathematical optimizationComputer scienceTelecommunications linkQuality of serviceProbabilistic logicQuantization (signal processing)Convex optimizationChannel (broadcasting)TransmitterOptimization problemControl theory (sociology)MathematicsAlgorithmRegular polygonWirelessComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the downlink of a cellular system in which the base station is equipped with multiple antennas and each user has a single antenna. We study the design of linear precoders with probabilistically-constrained Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for each user, in scenarios with uncertain channel state information (CSI) at the transmitter. Our goal is to design the precoder so as to minimize the total transmitted power subject to the satisfaction of the QoS constraints with a maximum allowed outage probability. We consider two stochastic models for the uncertainty in the channel coefficients of each user. The first is a Gaussian model that is appropriate for uncertainty that results from estimation errors. The second one is uniform model that is appropriate for the quantization errors in systems with quantized feedback of channel state information. We formulate the design problem as a chance constrained optimization problem, in which each chance constraint involves randomly perturbed second order cone constraints. We adopt a conservative approach that yields (deterministic) convex and efficiently-solvable design formulations that guarantee the satisfaction of the probabilistic QoS constraints. Furthermore, based on these convex formulations, we propose computationally-efficient algorithms that can reduce the level of conservatism in the initial formulations. Our simulations indicate that the proposed methods can significantly expands the range of QoS requirements that can be satisfied in the presence of uncertainty in the CSI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207