MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151872909 · doi:10.1142/s021812660200046x

A NEURAL BASED HUMAN FACE RECOGNITION SYSTEM USING AN EFFICIENT FEATURE EXTRACTION METHOD WITH PSEUDO ZERNIKE MOMENT

2002· article· en· W2151872909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Circuits Systems and Computers · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsZernike polynomialsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionComputer scienceArtificial neural networkFacial recognition systemClassifier (UML)Discrete cosine transformPrincipal component analysisRadial basis functionFace (sociological concept)Computer visionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an efficient method for the recognition of human faces in 2D digital images using a feature extraction technique that combines the global and local information in frontal view of facial images. The proposed feature extraction includes human face localization derived from the shape information. Efficient parameters are defined to eliminate irrelevant data while Pseudo Zernike Moments (PZM) with a new moment orders selection method is introduced as face features. The proposed method while yields better recognition rate, also reduces the classifier complexity. This paper also examines application of various feature domains as face features using the face localization method. These include Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). The Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network has been used as the classifier and we have shown that the proposed feature extraction method requires an RBF neural network classifier with a simpler structure and faster training phase that is less sensitive to select training and testing images. Simulation results on the Olivetti Research Laboratory (ORL) database and comparison with other techniques indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it