MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151908083 · doi:10.1071/aseg2015ab187

Geophysical Response of the Atlantida Cu-Au Porphyry Deposit, Chile - An Undercover Discovery in an Old District

2015· article· en· W2151908083 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Hope, Steven Andersson

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsFirst Quantum Minerals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryPorphyry copper depositSeismologyMining engineeringArchaeologyGeographyHydrothermal circulationFluid inclusions

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery of the Atlantida Cu-Au-Mo porphyry deposit is a recent example of exploration success under cover in a traditional mining jurisdiction. Early and appropriate acquisition of geophysics was a key tool in the discovery and in guiding resource definition drilling through the lifecycle of the project. Close review of the geophysical response of the deposit with respect to its lithological distribution and petrophysical properties has allowed it to be fully characterised despite no mineralisation being exposed at surface. Data acquired over the project includes induced polarisation, ground and airborne magnetics, gravimetry and petrophysics.The distribution of the key lithologies is demonstrated to be readily defined via a combined application of susceptibility and density properties, which agree well with geophysical data acquired at surface. This is in contrast to the electrical properties which instead map the extent of mineralisation associated with the hydrothermal system via chargeability, and the location of copper bearing sulphides via resistivityIn combination these characteristics can be used to infer depth to exploration targets and potential for high grade mineralisation in a geological context. Future exploration will be increasingly reliant on the understanding of the surface manifestations of buried deposits in remotely acquired data. This review summarises the application and results of these principles at the Atlantida project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207