The employment rights of people with serious mental illness in Ontario: considering the influence of dominant ideology on marginalizing practices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractA variety of explanations have been offered to account for the limited employment of people who experience serious mental illness (SMI) in northeastern Ontario. However, a rights perspective has not been one of them. This paper discusses some of the findings of a larger qualitative case study that may be pertinent to a discussion of rights. While state policy has been largely encouraging participation in employment, people with SMI continue to be marginalized from mainstream employment. In the community studied, more than 91% were experiencing unemployment. The state's adoption of neoliberal ideology within employment supports programs, with associated ideas of individualism, competition and equality of opportunity, could be argued to marginalize people who experience SMI from employment, limiting their right to employment. Occupational therapists are encouraged to bring a rights perspective to political and public attention, so that employment (and other occupations) becomes a part of the mental health services discourse.Keywords: Occupational rightshuman rightsdiscoursepolitics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".