Disparate effects of two phosphatidylcholine binding proteins, C-reactive protein and surfactant protein A, on pulmonary surfactant structure and function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C-reactive protein (CRP) and surfactant protein A (SP-A) are phosphatidylcholine (PC) binding proteins that function in the innate host defense system. We examined the effects of CRP and SP-A on the surface activity of bovine lipid extract surfactant (BLES), a clinically applied modified natural surfactant. CRP inhibited BLES adsorption to form a surface-active film and the film's ability to lower surface tension (gamma) to low values near 0 mN/m during surface area reduction. The inhibitory effects of CRP were reversed by phosphorylcholine, a water-soluble CRP ligand. SP-A enhanced BLES adsorption and its ability to lower gamma to low values. Small amounts of SP-A blocked the inhibitory effects of CRP. Electron microscopy showed CRP has little effect on the lipid structure of BLES. SP-A altered BLES multilamellar vesicular structure by generating large, loose bilayer structures that were separated by a fuzzy amorphous material, likely SP-A. These studies indicate that although SP-A and CRP both bind PC, there is a difference in the manner in which they interact with surface films.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".