AIRIS — THE CANADIAN HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGER: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Defence Research and Development Canada Agency has successfully completed a Technology Demonstration Program to assess the military utility of airborne hyperspectral Imagery. This required developing a sensor, the Airborne Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AIRIS), and collecting in-flight imagery data. AIRIS was designed as a flexible instrument using a Fourier Transform spectrometer with a spectral resolution ranging from 1 to 16 cm −1 , wide spectral coverage (2 to 12 microns), and different optical configurations. This paper provides a description of AIRIS and discusses examples of the spectral images collected during one air-trial. Emphasis is put on images of sub-pixel targets. Processing AIRIS data is labor intensive and can only be performed during post-trial analysis. Hardware and software modifications to AIRIS will implement a real-time processing capability over the next three years. These modifications will enable the instrument to output radiometrically calibrated digital spectrograms. These spectrograms will then be processed in real-time to output target detection and identification for selected target types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it