MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152042341 · doi:10.1093/protein/13.8.593

Characterization of function and activity of domains A, B and C of xylanase C from Fibrobacter succinogenes S85

2000· article· en· W2152042341 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Marrone, Kelly A. McAllister, Anthony J. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein Engineering Design and Selection · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicStudies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrobacter succinogenesXylanaseEnzyme kineticsXylanAmidohydrolaseChemistryAffinity chromatographyBiochemistryEnzymeStereochemistryActive siteFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xylanase C from the ruminant bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes is comprised of two catalytic domains, A and B, and a third domain, C, of unknown function. The DNA coding for domains A and B of xylanase C were separately cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli as fusion proteins with glutathione-S:-transferase. The fusion proteins were isolated by affinity chromatography on glutathione-Sepharose 4B, cleaved with thrombin and the released xylanase C catalytic domains A and B were purified to apparent homogeneity by anion-exchange chromatography on Mono Q. Electrospray mass spectrometry provided a molecular mass of 27 818 Da (expected, 27 820 Da) for domain B. The pH and temperature optima for activity of domain B on oat spelt xylan were 5.0 and 52 degrees C, respectively. A kinetic analysis of the activity of the catalytic domain A on oat spelt xylan, birch wood xylan and xylooligomers at pH 6.5 and 37 degrees C provided data significantly different to those obtained previously with a protease-derived form of the enzyme [Zhu et al. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 3885-3894]. The isolated domain A was more active on barley-glucan than the protease-derived form and its affinity for birch wood xylan was enhanced resulting in greater overall catalytic efficiency as reflected by k(cat)/K:(M) values. Likewise, significant differences in the Michaelis-Menten parameters K:(M), k(cat) and k(cat)/K:(M) were obtained with domain B compared with values previously reported with this domain attached to domain C. In general, the presence of domain C appeared to decrease the overall efficiency of domain B 7- and 36-fold with birch wood xylan and xylopentaose as substrates, respectively, as reflected by values of k(cat)/K:(M). The removal of domain C also affected the mode of action of domain B such that it more closely resembled that of catalytic domain A. However, no change in either pH and temperature optima or stability were found with domain B compared with the combined domains B and C. The function of domain C remains unknown, but hydrophobic cluster analysis indicated that it may belong to a class of dockerin domains involved in the protein-protein interactions of cellulolytic and xylanolytic complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtein Engineering Design and SelectionSame topicStudies on Chitinases and ChitosanasesFrench-language works237,207