MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152092660 · doi:10.1109/micrad.2008.4579473

A compact airborne G-band (183 GHz) water Vapor Radiometer and retrievals of liquid cloud parameters from coincident radiometer and millimeter wave radar measurements

2008· article· en· W2152092660 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew L. Pazmany, Mengistu Wolde

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiometerRemote sensingWater vaporEnvironmental scienceRadarLiquid water contentBrightness temperatureZenithEffective radiusLiquid water pathExtremely high frequencyW bandMicrowave radiometerMillimeterMeteorologyBrightnessOpticsPhysicsCloud computingGeologyAerosolTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ProSensing Inc. has developed a G-band (183 GHz, 1.5 mm wavelength) water Vapor Radiometer (GVR) for measuring low concentrations of atmospheric water vapor and liquid water. Using four double sideband receiver channels, the instrument measures brightness temperature at 183.31 +-1, +-3, +-7 and +-14 GHz . An airborne version of the instrument, packaged and wired to operate from a standard PMS probe canister, was successfully tested onboard the National Research Council of Canada Convair-580 aircraft during the Canadian CloudSat and CALIPSO validation flights (C3VP) through the winter of 2006-07. The Zenith G-band radiometer brightness temperature data collected with the GVR were complemented with co-located cloud reflectivity measurements with the NRC W and X-band (NAWX) radar system and in situ probes. By flying the aircraft in a stepped and porpoising ascent/descent patterns, liquid cloud water content was estimated from the GVR retrieved liquid water path. The effective radius and number density of liquid clouds were then estimated by combining the liquid water content with the W-band radar reflectivity factor (Z) and by applying a small correction factor, based on the characteristic drop size distribution shape of the observed cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207