MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152123924 · doi:10.1186/1824-7288-40-s1-a73

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and oral manifestations

2014· article· en· W2152123924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudio Romano, Sabrina Cardile

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRefluxDiseaseDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER) is a common condition in childhood characterized by rise of gastric contents into esophagus. According to International Consensus of Montreal, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the condition that develops when retrograde passage of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications that result in an impairment of quality of life of these [1]. In pediatric population, there are conditions at risk of developing GERD, like neurological impairment, history of esophageal atresia repaired and obesity [2]. The typical symptoms can include heartburn with or without regurgitation. For extra-esophageal syndromes, only dental erosions and Sandifer syndrome are considered conditions related to GERD. Acid reflux at level of oral cavity, in fact, can cause dissolution of tooth enamel, especially at level of palatal surfaces of back teeth, with a reported prevalence of up to 42% [3]. In a pediatric cross sectional study, in 112 children was found a significant incidence for dental erosion in patients with GERD respect to control group, both in primary and permanent teeth [4]. In general, however, oral manifestations of GERD are reported mainly. In pediatric population, dental erosion are not considered primary extra-esophageal manifestation of GERD because, when present, can be associated at multiple factors [5]. The typical manifestations can be considered dental caries, dry mouth, feeling at oral acid/burning sensation, halitosis, erythema of palatal mucosa and uvula. For diagnosis is mandatory exclude other causes, like dietary factors, drugs, poor oral hygiene, eating behavior disorders, genetic and racial factors. The esophageal pH monitoring and/or endoscopy are usually necessary just to confirm diagnosis of GERD. In this group of patients it’s possible to start a pharmacological therapy in association with modifications of diet (quantity and frequency of intake of foods and reduction of beverages that contain fat, sugars and acids) to decrease time of exposure at gastric acid and secretions. Therapeutic options are based on medical treatment or surgery in severe cases [6], although there are few studies to evaluate efficacy of treatment of GERD to prevent oral cavity lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œItalian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian journal of pediatricsSame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207