Screening of<i>Coprinus</i>Species for the Production of Extracellular Peroxidase and Evaluation of the Enzyme for the Treatment of Aqueous Phenol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The production of extracellular peroxidase by twenty-five strains of Coprinus species was investigated for the purpose of its application to the removal of phenolic and other aromatic compounds from industrial waste streams. After initial screening experiments, the production of peroxidase by three superior strains of C cinererus UAMH 4103, UAMH 7907 and IFO 30116 was monitored over a 15-day period. Peroxidase activity was detected after 3 days of growth and had reached itspeak another 6 days later. The peroxidase activity appeared to increase with a corresponding depletion of glucose concentration and rapidly declined immediately after the exhaustion of glucose. The effectiveness of the cultivated C. cinereus peroxidase (CIP) for the removal of aqueous phenol was evaluated in the presence and in the absence of additives including polyethylene glycol (PEG) and chitosan, and compared with those of purified horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and Arthromyces ramosus peroxidase (ARP). The addition of PEG and chitosan enhanced the efficiency of phenol transformation catalyzed by CIP by the factor of 1.5 and 1.3, respectively. Although the efficiency of phenol transformation was higher with CIP than those with purified HRP and ARP in the absence of addtives, its superiority diminished in the presence of PEG. This suggests that the by-products of fungal culture in the crude CIP solution, presumably polycarbohydrates and proteins, have protective effects on the enzyme against inactivation during catalytic transformation of phenol, and the addition of PEG provides small effects on further protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".