Phylogeny and adaptive radiation in the Onychopoda (Crustacea, Cladocera): evidence from multiple gene sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Members of the order Cladocera show remarkable morphological and ecological diversity. One of the most spectacular adaptive radiations in this group has involved species of the suborder Onychopoda, which have adopted a novel feeding strategy, predation, and have colonized habitats with a broad range of salinities. In order to evaluate the origins and systematics of this group, we derived a molecular phylogeny for its three component families including nine of 10 recognized genera based on three mitochondrial (mt) gene sequences: cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), the ribosomal small and large subunits (12S and 16S) and one nuclear gene sequence: the small ribosomal subunit (18S). Maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood and neighbour-joining phylogenetic analyses were largely congruent, supporting the monophyly of the suborder and each of its families. Comparative analyses of data based on total evidence and the conditional combination of the ribosomal genes produced relatively congruent patterns of phylogenetic affinity. By contrast, analyses of single gene results were inconsistent in recovering the monophyletic groups identified by the multigene analyses. Based on the reconstructed phylogeny, we discriminate among the existing hypotheses regarding the evolutionary history of the onychopods. We identify a prolonged episode of speciation from the Miocene to the Pleistocene with two pulses of diversification. We discuss our results with reference to the geological history of the Ponto-Caspian basin, the region which fostered the onychopod radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".