Factors That Influence the Decay Rate of the Potential at the Surface of Nonwoven Fabrics After Negative Corona Discharge Deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surface potential decay (SPD) measurements are considered as the most appropriate technique for the investigation of the corona charging of dielectric surfaces. The aim of the experiments reported in the present paper was to point out the peculiarities of SPD in the case of nonhomogeneous dielectrics, such as the nonwoven fabrics employed for heat, ventilation, and air conditioning. This paper reports experimental data collected on two types of polypropylene (PP) media, characterized by different fiber diameters. The experiments were performed on 60 mm × 50 mm samples of nonweaved sheets of PP (sheet thickness: 400 μm; average fiber diameter: 20 μm), in ambient air (temperature: 18°C to 22°C; relative humidity: 25% to 60%). The samples were charged for 10 s by exposing them to the negative corona discharge, using a triode-type electrode arrangement, energized from a dc high-voltage supply. Their surface potential was then measured with an electrostatic voltmeter. The measured data indicate that the charge of the filter is limited by the local discharges that occur inside the fibrous dielectric.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".