REGARD PARENTAL SUR LES DEVOIRS ET LES LEÇONS EN FONCTION DES CARACTÉRISTIQUES FAMILIALES ET DU RENDEMENT DE L’ÉLÈVE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’etude s’interesse a certains aspects des devoirs et des lecons par l’entremise d’analyses menees a partir de regroupements de familles en fonction de la structure familiale, de la scolarite des parents et du rendement scolaire de l’enfant. L’echantillon est compose de 465 parents d’eleves de 1 re et de 4 e annees du primaire. Les donnees ont ete recueillies a l’aide de questionnaires autoadministres au cours de la premiere annee de l’etude. Les analyses de comparaison revelent que les familles non traditionnelles et que les familles dont l’enfant eprouve des difficultes scolaires sont plus rebarbatives aux devoirs et aux lecons. Ces memes familles en percoivent moins l’utilite que les autres. Les familles moins scolarisees et les familles ayant un enfant en difficulte se sentent moins competentes pour intervenir de maniere adequate dans les devoirs et les lecons. Il appert que les besoins et les limites de ces familles doivent etre pris en consideration par les enseignants dans le cadre de l’assignation des devoirs et des lecons. Mots cles : devoirs et lecons, caracteristiques familiales, participation des parents, eleves du primaire In the present study, various aspects of homework were examined in a sample of 465 parents of first and fourth grades students in relation to family structure, parent’s education and school achievement. Data were collected through self-report questionnaires during the first year of the study. Analyses show that non traditional families and families of children with learning difficulties are less willing to help with homework. Those families don’t perceive its benefits as much as other families do. Less schooling families and families of children with learning difficulties have low self-efficacy to intervene adequately in homework. Family needs and limits must be taken into consideration by teachers when assigning homework. Key words: homeworks and lessons, family characteristics, parents involvement, pupils of primary education
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".