Free Cyanide Sorption on Freshwater Sediment and Model Components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sorption of free cyanide (HCN) on mineral components of sediment, activated carbon, and a freshwater sediment was studied via batch experiments in synthetic freshwater at pH 6.4–7.6. It was found that free cyanide did not sorb to any significant extent on sediment mineral components, but did sorb strongly to activated carbon and moderately to a freshwater sediment. Results of experiments with 100 and 150 μ g/L free cyanide spike amounts resulted in no observed sorption to kaolin clay, Ottawa sand, or alumina in the synthetic freshwater. Extensive removal of free cyanide from the aqueous phase was observed in the partitioning experiments with the powdered activated carbon. Results with whole sediment indicated up to 46% removal of free cyanide from the aqueous phase in experiments with 20 and 50 μ g/L free cyanide. The organic-carbon-normalized distribution coefficient Koc (= Cs/Cwfoc) for free cyanide sorption on the activated carbon (foc = 1.0), 4.2 L/gs, was similar to the Koc value for free cyanide sorption on the freshwater sediment (foc = 0.0031), approximately 12.9 L/gs. The results indicate that free cyanide can sorb to sediments with organic carbon content under freshwater conditions, primarily through interaction of HCN with organic carbon in the sediment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".