MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152335043 · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1895

Postnatal Virilization Mimicking 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency in 3 Very Premature Infants

2012· article· en· W2152335043 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Couch, Rose Girgis

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirilizationMedicineAndrogen ExcessAndrogenCongenital adrenal hyperplasiaDiscontinuationEndocrinologyTestosterone (patch)Internal medicineGestationGestational agePregnancyHormoneBiologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature infants are known to have elevated 17-hydroxyprogesterone and adrenal androgen concentrations immediately after birth, but the levels decrease rapidly. Virilization of normal premature female infants as a result of these high androgens has not been described. Three premature female infants born at 24 to 25 weeks' gestation, with birth weights 550 to 880 g and significant neonatal complications were noted to develop clitoromegaly 2 weeks to 3 months after birth. All 3 had elevated 17-hydroxyprogesterone >100 nmol/L and testosterone >3 nmol/L concentrations. All were treated as simple virilizing 21-hydroxylase deficiency, but subsequent genetic analysis revealed no CYP21 mutations. Follow-up after discontinuation of treatment revealed no recurrent virilization and normal adrenal steroid levels. Postnatal virilization in sick premature girls may occur, and investigations may suggest 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Genetic analysis of CYP21 should be performed before the diagnosis is confirmed. Further studies are needed to better document the natural history and possible causes of postnatal adrenal androgen secretion in sick premature infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicSexual Differentiation and DisordersFrench-language works237,207