MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152344767 · doi:10.1002/geot.201100005

Role of brittle fracture in swelling behaviour: evidence from tunnelling case histories / Sprödbruch in wenig festem Fels als Auslöser von Quellvorgängen: Erkenntnisse aus Fallstudien

2011· article· en· W2152344767 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomechanics and Tunnelling · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsCentre for Excellence in Mining Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwellingBrittle fractureBrittlenessGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceFracture (geology)Composite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The evaluation of several case histories of tunnels in swelling rock with sulfate bearing minerals shows that brittle fracture plays an important role in the development of swelling processes. Brittle failure by spalling has been directly observed in several tunnels, as early as the 19th century and more recently. Numerical analyses applied to different case histories with observed heave and development of strong swelling pressure, considering different construction processes; agree with the observed swelling zones. The effect of construction procedures on swelling in particular the development of pressures and swelling zones becomes evident from these analyses. For a better understanding of swelling processes brittle failure processes have to be considered in the analyses. Die Auswertungen von Beobachtungen aus ausgeführten Tunneln im Sulfat führenden Gebirge zeigen, dass Sprödbruchvorgänge eine entscheidende Rolle spielen im Aufbau von Quelldrücken und Quellhebungen. Einerseits wurden in verschiedenen Tunneln, teilweise im 19. Jahrhundert, Sprödbruchvorgänge direkt beobachtet, wenn Abschalungen auftraten. Andererseits konnte mit numerischen Analysen gezeigt werden, dass je nach Bauvorgang unterschiedlich große, zerbrochene Zonen auftreten, die mit beobachteten Quellzonen und Hebungen an ausgeführten Bauwerken gut übereinstimmen. Die Auswirkung unterschiedlicher Bauvorgänge auf Größe der Quelldrücke und der quellenden Bereiche kann zumindest qualitativ nachgewiesen werden. Bei Tunnelbauten in quellendem Gebirge ist die Ausbildung von Sprödbrüchen zu berücksichtigen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it