Properties of co-extruded nanoclay-filled aliphatic nylon (PA6)/linear low-density polyethylene and aromatic nylon (MXD6)/ linear low-density polyethylene multilayer films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, coextruded multilayer films with aliphatic (polyamide 6) and aromatic (poly (m-xylene adipamide)) nylons as well as their in-situ polymerized nanocomposites with 4 wt% nanoclay, as an oxygen barrier layer (core), and a linear low-density polyethylene, as a moisture barrier layer (skin), were produced and characterized. Five-layer films were prepared by cast coextrusion and rapidly cooled using an air knife. Dynamic rheological measurements showed that the selected materials can be coextruded with a minimum interfacial instability between the melt flows in the feed block. Type of crystals, crystallinity and thermal transitions of layers were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and modulated differential scanning calorimetry. The mechanical, optical, oxygen and water vapor barrier properties of the coextruded multilayer films were measured and discussed. Although the crystallinity of the poly (m-xylene adipamide) layer in the multilayer films was lower compared to the polyamide 6 layer, the impermeability to oxygen and water vapor was much better for the former multilayer films. In addition, substituting the neat polyamide 6 and poly (m-xylene adipamide) by their nanocomposites improved the oxygen barrier of the multilayer films by more than 50%. The series resistance model was not able to predict the barrier properties of the multilayer films due to the difference in polymer behavior for the single layer and multilayer, and boundary adjacent layer effects. The coextruded polyamide linear low-density polyethylene multilayer films showed higher toughness, tear and flex crack resistance compared to the poly (m-xylene adipamide)/linear low-density polyethylene samples. The pristine poly (m-xylene adipamide)-based multilayer film showed a lower haze compared to the polyamide 6 films due to very little crystallinity in the former.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".