MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152401403 · doi:10.1177/8756087914528348

Properties of co-extruded nanoclay-filled aliphatic nylon (PA6)/linear low-density polyethylene and aromatic nylon (MXD6)/ linear low-density polyethylene multilayer films

2014· article· en· W2152401403 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Fereydoon, Seyed H. Tabatabaei, Abdellah Ajji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plastic Film & Sheeting · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolyamideNylon 6Composite materialDifferential scanning calorimetryCrystallinityPolyethyleneLinear low-density polyethyleneLow-density polyethyleneBlow moldingPolymer chemistryNanocompositeLayer (electronics)Polymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, coextruded multilayer films with aliphatic (polyamide 6) and aromatic (poly (m-xylene adipamide)) nylons as well as their in-situ polymerized nanocomposites with 4 wt% nanoclay, as an oxygen barrier layer (core), and a linear low-density polyethylene, as a moisture barrier layer (skin), were produced and characterized. Five-layer films were prepared by cast coextrusion and rapidly cooled using an air knife. Dynamic rheological measurements showed that the selected materials can be coextruded with a minimum interfacial instability between the melt flows in the feed block. Type of crystals, crystallinity and thermal transitions of layers were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry and modulated differential scanning calorimetry. The mechanical, optical, oxygen and water vapor barrier properties of the coextruded multilayer films were measured and discussed. Although the crystallinity of the poly (m-xylene adipamide) layer in the multilayer films was lower compared to the polyamide 6 layer, the impermeability to oxygen and water vapor was much better for the former multilayer films. In addition, substituting the neat polyamide 6 and poly (m-xylene adipamide) by their nanocomposites improved the oxygen barrier of the multilayer films by more than 50%. The series resistance model was not able to predict the barrier properties of the multilayer films due to the difference in polymer behavior for the single layer and multilayer, and boundary adjacent layer effects. The coextruded polyamide linear low-density polyethylene multilayer films showed higher toughness, tear and flex crack resistance compared to the poly (m-xylene adipamide)/linear low-density polyethylene samples. The pristine poly (m-xylene adipamide)-based multilayer film showed a lower haze compared to the polyamide 6 films due to very little crystallinity in the former.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plastic Film & SheetingSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207