Long-term administration of monoamine oxidase inhibitors alters the firing rate and pattern of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) exert their antidepressant action by increasing the function of the serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine and dopamine (DA) systems. There is, however, limited electrophysiological data on the effects of MAOIs on DA neurons. The effects of 2-d and 21-d administration of three MAOIs were investigated (clorgyline, selective MAOI-A; deprenyl, selective MAOI-B; phenelzine, non-selective MAOI) on the firing activity of DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area using in-vivo electrophysiology in rats. Short-term clorgyline (1 mg/kg) and phenelzine (2.5 mg/kg) was devoid of effect on DA neurons, whereas prolonged administration significantly decreased their firing rate (by 30% and 20%, respectively), number of bursts (by 80% and 45%, respectively), and percentage of spikes occurring in bursts only in clorgyline-treated rats (70%). Deprenyl (0.25 mg/kg) was without effects. DA firing was restored in clorgyline-treated rats by inhibiting 5-HT synthesis using para-chlorophenylalanine (p-CPA; 300 mg/kg. d for three consecutive days). The 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) was devoid of effect in control rats, but completely reversed the alterations of DA neuronal activity in clorgyline-treated rats. An attenuation of DA neuronal activity was thus produced by prolonged blockade of MAOA activity. The absence of effect of MAOA inhibition after subacute administration suggested an indirect mechanism. This was confirmed by the observation that p-CPA antagonized the effects of clorgyline. Since ondansetron completely reversed the effects of clorgyline on DA neuronal activity, the effects of MAOA inhibition appeared to be mediated by 5-HT3 receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".