MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152514381 · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.152918

A New System for Comparative Functional Genomics of <i>Saccharomyces</i> Yeasts

2013· article· en· W2152514381 on OpenAlexafffund
Amy A. Caudy, Yuanfang Guan, Yue Jia, Christina Hansen, Chris DeSevo, Alicia P. Hayes, Joy Agee, Juan R. Alvarez‐Dominguez, Hugo F. Arellano, Daniel R. Barrett, Cynthia Bauerle, Namita Bisaria, Patrick H. Bradley, Jeffrey S. Breunig, Erin Bush, David Cappel, Emily J. Capra, Walter W. Chen, John J. Clore, Peter A. Combs, Christopher D Doucette, Olukunle O. Demuren, Peter Fellowes, Samuel S. Freeman, Evgeni M. Frenkel, Daniel Gadala-Maria, Richa Gawande, David S. Glass, Samuel Grossberg, Anita Gupta, Latanya Hammonds-Odie, Aaron Hoisos, Jenny H. Hsi, Yu-Han H. Hsu, Sachi Inukai, Konrad J. Karczewski, Xiaobo Ke, Mina Kojima, Samuel Leachman, Danny Lieber, Anna Liebowitz, Julia Liu, Yufei Liu, Trevor Martin, Jose Mena, Rosa M. Mendoza, Cameron Myhrvold, Christian Millian, Sarah J. Pfau, Sandeep Raj, Matt Rich, Joe Rokicki, William Rounds, Michael Salazar, Matthew Salesi, Rajani Sharma, Sanford J. Silverman, Cara Singer, Sandhya Sinha, Max V. Staller, Philip Stern, Hanlin Tang, Sharon R. Weeks, Maxwell Weidmann, Ashley R. Wolf, Carmen Young, Jie Yuan, Christopher A. Crutchfield, Megan N. McClean, Coleen T. Murphy, Manuel Llinás, David Botstein, Olga G. Troyanskaya, Maitreya J. Dunham

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersU.S. National Library of MedicineNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Human Genome Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPrinceton UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsGenomeComparative genomicsGeneSaccharomyces cerevisiaeModel organismFunctional genomicsComputational biologySaccharomycesHuman evolutionary geneticsGenomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole-genome sequencing, particularly in fungi, has progressed at a tremendous rate. More difficult, however, is experimental testing of the inferences about gene function that can be drawn from comparative sequence analysis alone. We present a genome-wide functional characterization of a sequenced but experimentally understudied budding yeast, Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum (henceforth referred to as S. bayanus), allowing us to map changes over the 20 million years that separate this organism from S. cerevisiae. We first created a suite of genetic tools to facilitate work in S. bayanus. Next, we measured the gene-expression response of S. bayanus to a diverse set of perturbations optimized using a computational approach to cover a diverse array of functionally relevant biological responses. The resulting data set reveals that gene-expression patterns are largely conserved, but significant changes may exist in regulatory networks such as carbohydrate utilization and meiosis. In addition to regulatory changes, our approach identified gene functions that have diverged. The functions of genes in core pathways are highly conserved, but we observed many changes in which genes are involved in osmotic stress, peroxisome biogenesis, and autophagy. A surprising number of genes specific to S. bayanus respond to oxidative stress, suggesting the organism may have evolved under different selection pressures than S. cerevisiae. This work expands the scope of genome-scale evolutionary studies from sequence-based analysis to rapid experimental characterization and could be adopted for functional mapping in any lineage of interest. Furthermore, our detailed characterization of S. bayanus provides a valuable resource for comparative functional genomics studies in yeast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneticsSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207