MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152521677 · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32832

Porous calcium polyphosphate as load‐bearing bone substitutes:<i>In vivo</i>study

2012· article· en· W2152521677 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert M. Pilliar, Rita A. Kandel, Marc D. Grynpas, Youxin Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMaterials sciencePorosityFixation (population genetics)PolyphosphateCalciumBiomedical engineeringFEMORAL CONDYLEImplantIn vivoLoad bearingBiocompatibilityComposite materialAnatomyChemistrySurgeryMedicineMetallurgyPhosphate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porous calcium polyphosphate (CPP) is being investigated for fabrication of novel biodegradable bone substitutes. In this study, porous CPP implants formed by conventional CPP powder packing and using a two-step sinter/anneal process was used to form 20 and 30 vol % porous samples displaying relatively high strength. These were implanted in rabbit femoral condyle sites to study their ability for secure fixation in prepared sites through bone ingrowth. Porous implants of 20 and 30 vol % porosity and displaying compressive strengths ~80 and 35 MPa, respectively, were used. Bone ingrowth sufficient to allow secure implant fixation was observed by 6 weeks (~19% bone ingrowth per available pore space for the 30 vol % and 13% for the 20 vol % porous implants). The results of the in vivo study suggest the potential usefulness of porous CPP as biodegradable bone substitutes/augments in high load-bearing skeletal regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied BiomaterialsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207