Nimesulide May Be More Efficient Than Allopurinol in Protecting Pancreas From Acute Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in an Animal Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of allopurinol and nimesulide in the protection of the pancreas from acute ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 rabbits were divided into 3 groups, group A: acute I/R only; group B: allopurinol (30 mg/kg) was administered intravenously 10 minutes before ischemia; group C: nimesulide (50 mg/kg) was given intraperitoneally 20 minutes before ischemia. Neopterin and superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels were examined. Pancreatic biopsies were obtained for electron microscopy study. RESULTS: The mean neopterin concentrations in group A are 3.56 ± 3.41, 7.74 ± 3.59, and 8.94 ± 2.86 ng/mL, respectively, in the stabilization, ischemia, and reperfusion phases; group B: 3.40 ± 3.03, 7.45 ± 8.89, and 10.64 ± 7.47 ng/mL; and group C: 3.41 ± 2.71, 5.67 ± 2.76, and 4.34 ± 2.87 ng/mL. The mean SOD concentrations in group A are 4.25 ± 1.79, 4.48 ± 1.60, and 5.57 ± 1.15 ng/mL; group B: 4.32 ± 0.81, 5.08 ± 1.10, and 4.45 ± 1.31 ng/mL; and group C: 4.10 ± 0.99, 5.23 ± 1.60, and 3.72 ± 1.30 ng/mL. Histopathology showed the least deterioration in group C. CONCLUSION: Nimesulide is more efficient than allopurinol in protecting pancreas from acute I/R injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".