On the dynamics of the large-scale structures in round impinging jets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-averaged two-point measurements of the fluctuating wall pressure and instantaneous measurements of the full fluctuating wall pressure field were performed in incompressible turbulent impinging jets with nozzle-to-plate spacings of 2 and 4 diameters, Reynolds numbers of 23 300, and Mach numbers of 0.03. An azimuthal Fourier decomposition of the fluctuating wall pressure revealed that the fluctuations in the stagnation region were dominated by azimuthal mode 1 to 3, and the contributions from these modes were larger for the jet with $H/D=4$ . Azimuthal modes 0 and 1 made significant contributions to the pressure fluctuations in the wall jet region of both jets, indicating that the large-scale ring structures formed in the jet shear-layer play a prominent role in this region. The contributions from modes 0 and 1 in the wall jet were smaller for the jet with $H/D=4$ indicating that the ring structures play a less prominent role in the wall jet region as the nozzle-to-plate distance increased. A wavelet analysis of the transient fluctuations indicated that azimuthal mode 1 had dominant high-frequency and low-frequency components, while azimuthal mode 0 had only the higher-frequency oscillations. The higher-frequency components of azimuthal modes 0 and 1 occurred in both the stagnation and the wall jet regions and are attributed to the asymmetric evolution of the ring structures in the jet. The low-frequency oscillations were primarily associated with azimuthal mode 1 and were evident only in the stagnation region. These oscillations became more prominent as the nozzle-to-plate distance was increased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".