Expression and nuclear localization of BLM, a chromosome stability protein mutated in Bloom’s syndrome, suggest a role in recombination during meiotic prophase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bloom's syndrome (BS) is a recessive human genetic disorder characterized by short stature, immunodeficiency and elevated risk of malignancy. BS cells have genomic instability and an increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange. The gene mutated in BS, BLM, encodes a 3'-5' helicase (BLM) with homology to bacterial recombination factor, RecQ. Human males homozygous for BLM mutations are infertile and heterozygous individuals display increased frequencies of structural chromosome abnormalities in their spermatozoa. Also, mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of BLM, Sgs1, cause a delay in meiotic nuclear division and a reduction in spore viability. These observations suggest that BLM may play a role during meiosis. Our antibodies raised against the C terminus of the human protein specifically recognize both mouse and human BLM in western blots of cell lines and in successive developmental stages of spermatocytes, but fail to detect BLM protein in a cell line with a C-terminally truncated protein. BLM protein expression and location are detected by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy as discrete foci that are sparsely present on early meiotic prophase chromosome cores, later found abundantly on synapsed cores, frequently in combination with the recombinases RAD51 and DMC1, and eventually as pure BLM foci. The colocalization of RAD51/DMC1 with BLM and the statistically significant excess of BLM signals in the synapsed pseudoautosomal region of the X-Y chromosomes, which is a recombinational hot spot, provide indications that BLM protein may function in the meiotic recombination process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".