MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152664043 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2008.2011270

Space Vector Modulation for Low Switching Frequency Current Source Converters With Reduced Low-Order Noncharacteristic Harmonics

2009· article· en· W2152664043 on OpenAlexaff
Luiz A. C. Lopes, M. F. Naguib

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace vector modulationHarmonicsModulation indexTotal harmonic distortionConvertersElectronic engineeringModulation (music)ThyristorControl theory (sociology)EngineeringComputer scienceInverterVoltageElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcousticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-power current source converters (CSCs) are usually implemented with gate turn off thyristors (GTOs) or integrated gate commutated thyristors (IGCTs) that present a maximum switching frequency of a few kilohertz. Space vector modulation (SVM) offers a very elegant way of generating CSC gating signals online with increased gain and reduced switching frequency. However, for very low switching frequency, SVM results in low-order (5th and 7th) noncharacteristic harmonics complicating the design of the input filter. The reduction of the magnitude of these harmonics has been sought mostly through new sequences of space vectors (states) that present better performance for different ranges of modulation index and power factor. Moderate improvement can be obtained by calculating the statespsila on times for the reference vector in the middle of an SVM cycle. This paper proposes calculating the statespsila on times as the reference vector rotates. Simulation results show that this approach results in a significant reduction in the harmonic distortion of these two components, which, for a selected sequence of states, can be limited to 0.3% of the fundamental component as the modulation index varies from 0.05 to 1.0. Experimental results obtained with a digital signal processor development kit are also provided to show the superior performance of the proposed techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207